Funding Health Care For All Americans
October 18-19, 2007
The paying for a comprehensive health care reform proposal is critical. It determines the economic feasibility of a proposal and it effects the efficiency of the delivery of care. There are many aspects of funding that must be addressed. What should the actuarial value of the basic package be? What factors should influence the actuarial value? How frequently should the value change? How should subsidies to the poor be structured? Is it better to have implicit subsidies or explicit income-related subsidies? If the subsidies are income-related, at what income do the subsidies end and how are these subsidies phased out?
There are questions about the taxes used to fund health care. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using different taxes such as VAT, income taxes or negative income taxes, payroll taxes, etc.? Should the tax be earmarked? If earmarked, how can this be guaranteed? How can financial reserves be created? How large should the reserves be? What happens if costs exceed financing? There are also considerations of how change in financing from employers and taxes related to Medicaid and other programs to a single tax would affect the economy. Also by separating health coverage from employment, there are serious questions about how such a plan would affect labor markets.
PDF FILES 
Working Papers:
Workshop Summary
Rapporteur Notes
Articles:
Victor R. Fuchs and John B. Shoven
Funding Health Care For All Americans--An Economic Perspective
Jonathan Oberlander, Ph.D.
The Politics of Paying for Health Reform--Zombies, Payroll Taxes, and the Holy Grail
Commentaries:
Alan J. Auerbach
Commentary Auerbach Funding Health Care for All Americans
Peter R. Fisher
Commentary
Fisher Comments on Fuchs & Shoven
Commentary Fisher Comments on Oberlander
Chris Jennings
Alice M. Rivlin
Commentary Rivlin on Funding Health Care
Powerpoint Presentations:
Fuchs Shoven presentation